GodGuides4:175
Active member
The topic is excellent and we can all identify with it.
At the beginning of the process I had an extreme cognitive dissonance and it was a period when the brain was fighting with the heart or better to say intellect with emotion. My heart wanted to go with what we found our elders on - tradition, traditional practices and beliefs but it was not possible.
At that time I was naive and believed that I could change the people around me as it is so simple, but I quickly realized that things are not simple as that and that people cannot separate religion from tradition because they think that they will lose their identity.
This means that it is not an easy path that we choose, it is easier to be part of the majority. If we take the Prophet Muhammad as an example, we understand that he also went through the similar stages.
In surah 18:6, Allah says to him: “Should you grieve yourself to death if they are not willing to believe in this Message?”
Now, after this first phase I understand things differently, I analyze people and approach them in a wiser way.
I will quote Hassan Farhan al Maliki here who says:
“As for the subject of reviving hearts that are diseased,
you need to understand something first;
Presenting real evidence isn't enough to make people accept the truth.
Most people simply don't follow evidence and proofs.
Most people just follow the commonly held beliefs, ie. mainstream public opinions, or the most influential external forces of authority.
These "authorities of influence" could be a sect, country, region, group, faction, religious movement, or group of friends. Or a mixture of some or all of them.
Those are the things that truly influence most people, not the evidence.
If evidence and signs were enough, then the Israelites wouldn't have worshiped the calf after they had seen the Nine Signs, the splitting of the sea, Moses's staff, and his hand blazing white, etc.
They saw all of that, but it wasn't enough because the hearts must be alive first. There must be a working conscience for signs to act on.
If a person's heart and conscience have been corrupted in some way, then no amount of evidence will help him.”
I think this sums up a lot of questions.
Also need to say that I think ‘jihad’ as presented in the Quran is our constant struggle between intellect and emotion. It doesn’t have to be, but that's my conclusion for now.
peace
I second my sisters comment. Thank you for sharing!
You grant me opportunity to consider over several much needed things and your take on jihad is interesting. I will try to keep in mind as I read the Quran in these areas.
I have went back and forth on if there is a dichotomy of intellect and emotions...on experiential/practical working out level I find often that is the foundation issue amiss spiritually for me...one or the other is leading too much and not in harmony balance together.
I was recently exposed to Islamic mystic perspective of nafs...and the head/intellect needs to rule over heart and the intellect and heart rule over appetites...of which I deeply appreciate that none are viewed as inherently bad or something we should seek to destroy...ie our desires and pleasures are gifts from Allah.
For another perspective: I have also read of Islamic perspective that they thought Quran supported idea that "feeling generates thought"
Don't remember the verses and points but interesting perspective too...
Last edited: