Is Prophet Muhammad "Sultan Muhammad Al Fatih" (30 March 1432 – 3 May 1481) ?

[Iron Man]

Is Prophet Muhammad "Sultan Muhammad Al Fatih" (30 March 1432 – 3 May 1481) ?

Mehmed II - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A series of events that led me to think this

About a year ago this video appeared on my feed.
"JERUSALEM" WAS IN EUROPE | Dar-us-Salam is in the Hereafter

I learned about David Ewing Jr, I then downloaded all his books, read them all, learned about Anatoly Fomenko, downloaded the books - History : Science or Fiction ?

History Fiction Or Science 2003 2015 [ 22 Books In 1] Fomenko, Anatoly : Anatoly Fomenko : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

History: Fiction or Science? by Anatoly Fomenko [22 books in 1]

archive.org

After a quick read :
Fomenko claims 1000 years have been added to the calendar. He also claims all events and characters conventionally dated earlier than eleventh century are fictional, and represent “phantom reflections” of actual Middle Ages events and characters, brought about by intentional or accidental misdatings of historical documents.

i was shocked to learn this, i wanted to know if Fomenkos claims were true, so i decided to dig deep into this matter and i discovered this :
Vasai Fort ruins of a medieval garrison -

Vasai Fort ruins of a medieval garrison - U.A. Satish

Vasai Fort is a large fort overlooking Bassein Creek. It is also known as Bassein Fort and has a lot of history behind it.

uasatish.com

if you look at the tombstones you will see the dates 684 and 601.

Now according to the historians :
Vasai Fort, also known as Bassein Fort, was a Portuguese military and commercial base in India for over 300 years. The fort was built in 1536 and was the Portuguese headquarters in the north of India, second only to Goa.
isnt this strange ?

the tombstones read 684 and 601 (7th century) , but the historians say the portuguese built the fort in the 16th century.
do you see a problem ?

i didn't stop there, i continued to dig deeper and I came across this book written apparently in 1791.

Pfälzischer kleiner Kalender Auf d. Jahr... enth. Die Geschlechtsverz. Aller in Europa herrschenden Häuser; nebst einer vollständigen Anzeige der Pfälzischen Merkwürdigkeiten : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

archive.org

it contains details of important/famous people and their dates of birth

Here's 1 example : Page 15 - 1st entry:
Anhalt-Bernburg, Forst, Fried. (Friedrich) Albrecht born 15. Aug. 735
https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_n9BBAAAAcAAJ/page/n17/mode/2up?view=theater

According to wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Albert,_Prince_of_Anhalt-Bernburg
the same person Frederick Albert was born in Bernburg on 15 August 1735

book = born 15. Aug. 735
wikipedia = 15 August 1735
do we have a problem here ?

the above evidence proves that fomenko is right and a 1000 years have been added to the timeline.

a question comes to mind, did Prophet Muhammad actually live in 6-7th century ?

so i decided to find an event in the quran which i could place into history, surah 30 : The Rome come to my mind, after reading the first 6 ayahs
30:1 ALM.
30:2 The Romans have won. <=== Other translators : The byzantines have lost
30:3 At the lowest part on the earth. But after their victory, they will be defeated.
30:4 In a few more years. The decision before and after is for God, and on that day the believers will rejoice.
30:5 With the victory of God. God gives victory to whom He wishes; He is the Noble, the Merciful.
30:6 Such is the pledge of God, and God does not break His pledge, but most of the people do not know.

translation : monotheist group

i did a search for the "fall of the roman empire" :
result =
Rome continued to decline after that until AD 476 when the western Roman Empire came to an end. The eastern Roman Empire, more commonly known as the Byzantine Empire, survived until the 15th century AD. It fell when Turks took control of its capital city, Constantinople (modern day Istanbul in Turkey) in AD 1453.

we get 2 dates 476 AD and 1453 AD.
it cant be 476 AD because according to the majority the quran was revealed much later so surah rum cannot be talking about this event, so we only have 1453 AD left.
Lets take a look at 1453
According to the majority Sultan Mehmed ii conquered constantinople in 1453.

A thought crossed my mind, Could it be possible that surah rum is actually referring to the conquest of constantinople by Sultan Mehmed ii (Muhammad) in 1453 ?

some time later found this pdf x185 the_secrets_of_the_ark_newton_v3

https://chronologia.org/en/articles/marfull/x185the_secre_of_the_ark_newton_v3.pdf

On page 20 there is a diagram, in the diagram it reads : ottoman occupation of constantinople Mehmed ii = Muhammad

i couldn't believe it, someone else had also figured out that mehmed ii is muhammad,
i dint know it was anatoly fomenko because his books History : Science or fiction had no details of this.

then many moons later i came across this new youtube channel : https://www.youtube.com/@History_Science_or_Fiction

and many videos later they uploaded this video :

here we have Gleb Nosovsky talking about the prophet and the middle ages :
then in another video Gleb Nosovsky mentioned the names of other books they had written, one of those books was called Пророк завоеватель = Prophet Conqueror.

I then started looking for this book but was unable to find it in english, so i did a search in russian and after many many days i find this :

http://flibusta.site/b/448208/read

I think and so do Anatoly fomenko and Gleb nosovsky that Sultan Muhammad Al Fatih (30 March 1432 – 3 May 1481)) is Prophet Muhammad and he conquered Constantinople (Rome) in 1453.

I think Surah Rum and Surah Al Fath speaks about this event but the majority will have us believe that someone else called Mehmed II (a descendant of prophet Muhammad) conquered constantinople in 1453. Evidence of this is below :

It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said:
“Even if there was only one day left of this world, Allah would make it last until a man from my household took possession of (the mountain of) Dailam and Constantinople.”

The Chapters on Jihad - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم)

It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: “Allah has prepared (reward) for those who go out (to fight) in His cause: ‘And do not go out except (to fight) for Jihad in My cause, out of faith in Me and belief in My Messengers, but he has a guarantee from Me that I w

sunnah.com

Constantinople in the hadiths :

Search Results - Search Results - constantinople (page 1) - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم)

Hadith of the Prophet Muhammad (saws) in English and Arabic

sunnah.com

further study :
30 Rum (Rome)
47 Muhammad
48 Al Fath (The Victory)

Link to the book in English : Prophet Conqueror https://drive.google.com/file/d/1s1LZbs_3Q_jf_Ed_4fUajwbWUiUmm_6U/view?usp=drive_link

enough said.
peace and blessings

 

[Iron Man]

FROM THE LECTURE SERIES: Turning Points in Modern History

The Fall of Constantinople Was the True End of the Roman Empire

Many history books say that the Roman Empire ended in the 5th century, and that is true in one sense. However, the reality, as always, is a bit more complex. The true end of the Roman Empire didn’t materialize till about a thousand years later, with the fall of Constantinople. So, why has Constantinople considered a continuation of the Roman Empire and why did it eventually fall?

Imagine that we are standing on the ramparts of an ancient imperial city. It’s a spring day in the year 1453, and below us are uncountable, shouting, surging crowds of enemy soldiers who are massing for an attack on our city. High above those frenzied masses, we are standing on great thick walls that are already a thousand years old. Until now, the walls have always held, repelling siege after siege, attack after attack.

Shortly, we hear a new sound, louder and more frightening than any we have heard before—the booming thunder of siege cannon, beginning to pound, shatter, and then breach these great walls. That rumble of great cannon we hear in the distance announces the true end of the Roman Empire.

Many educated people think they know about the fall of the Roman Empire, long ago at the start of the medieval period. They believe that the glory that was Rome collapsed when in 410, the Visigoths sacked Rome, or in 455 when the Vandals sacked Rome again, or when finally in 476 Germanic tribes slouched into the imperial capital in Italy and simply deposed the last Roman emperor in the west.

Those bare facts are true, but the real story is much more complicated, and actually comes much later. The real end of the Roman Empire as a whole actually happened a thousand years later, at the dawn of our modern age, with the fall of the great imperial city of Constantinople to the Ottoman Turks. Today this is the city of Istanbul in Turkey. In 1453, it was the focus of a dramatic turning point.

June 15, 2020 European History, History
By Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius, Ph.D., The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

 

[rdamech]

Salam

It's important to note that Byzantium is a term coined by a British historian in the 16th century ( if I remember correctly). His intent was to separate West and East as to appropriate the West for themselves( as inhiritors). The part of the Roman Empire in the east always considered itself Roman. The writings from east Romans as well as Arabs at that time proves this.

As a History buff myself, the claim you make seems a little far fetched. You can't ignore the rise of the Oumayyad and the Abbassid that led to the"Islamic" golden age or the sack of Baghdad by the mongols that put a definite end to a high culture initiated by the Arabs ( thanks to early Quanic teachings).

That being said, it's always good to do your own research, a lot of which I thought to be historical facts turned out to be questionable.

Allah knows best